Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 7 results ...
Hallowell, M R, Hardison, D and Desvignes, M (2016) Information technology and safety: Integrating empirical safety risk data with building information modeling, sensing, and visualization technologies. Construction Innovation, 16(03), 323-47.
Holt, G D (2016) Opposing influences on construction plant and machinery health and safety innovations. Construction Innovation, 16(03), 390-414.
Karimi, H, Taylor, T R B, Goodrum, P M and Srinivasan, C (2016) Quantitative analysis of the impact of craft worker availability on construction project safety performance. Construction Innovation, 16(03), 307-22.
Lee, W and Migliaccio, G C (2016) Physiological cost of concrete construction activities. Construction Innovation, 16(03), 281-306.
Liu, M, Han, S and Lee, S (2016) Tracking-based 3D human skeleton extraction from stereo video camera toward an on-site safety and ergonomic analysis. Construction Innovation, 16(03), 348-67.
Siddula, M, Dai, F, Ye, Y and Fan, J (2016) Classifying construction site photos for roof detection: A machine-learning method towards automated measurement of safety performance on roof sites. Construction Innovation, 16(03), 368-89.
Teizer, J (2016) Right-time vs real-time pro-active construction safety and health system architecture. Construction Innovation, 16(03), 253-80.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: performance measures,accident prevention framework,automation and control,construction safety and health,lagging and leading indicators,right-time alert and warning technologies
- ISBN/ISSN:
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2015-0049
- Abstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the critical time window for pro-active construction accident prevention and response. Large to small organisations throughout the entire construction supply chain continue to be challenged to adequately prevent accidents. Construction worker injuries and fatalities represent significant waste of resources. Although the five C’s (culture, competency, communication, controls and contractors) have been focusing on compliance, good practices and best-in-class strategies, even industry leaders have only marginal improvements in recorded safety statistics for many years. Design/methodology/approach Right-time vs real-time construction safety and health identifies three major focus areas to aid in the development of a strategic, as opposed to tactical, response. Occupational safety and health by design, real-time safety and health monitoring and alerts and education, training and feedback leveraging state-of-the-art technology provide meaningful predictive, quantitative and qualitative measures to identify, correlate and eliminate hazards before workers get injured or incidents cause collateral damage. Findings The current state and development of existing innovative initiatives in the occupational construction safety and health domain are identified. A framework for right-time vs real-time construction safety and health presents the specific focus on automated safety and health data gathering, analysis and reporting to achieve better safety performance. The developed roadmap for right-time vs real-time safety and health is finally tested in selected application scenarios of high concern in the construction industry. Originality/value A strategic roadmap to eliminate hazards and accidents through right-time vs real-time automation is presented that has practical as well as social implications on conducting a rigorous safety culture and climate in a construction business and its entire supply chain.